The TER (Total Expense Ratio) is a fund's or ETF's total annual cost expressed as a percentage of assets: it includes the management fee, the fund's internal custody, administration and operating expenses. A 0.20% TER means that every year 0.20% of the fund's value goes to the manager — deducted automatically from the price, without you ever seeing a charge.
That invisibility is exactly what makes it dangerous: it doesn't hurt, it doesn't show, and it compounds against you for decades.
Accumulated cost ≈ what stops compounding, not just what you payWith €10,000 at 7% per year over 30 years:
The difference — almost €25,000, a third of the outcome — was never paid in bills: it evaporated from the compounding curve. That is why TER is criterion number one when comparing products that track the same thing.
It covers the fund's running costs: management, administration, internal custody, audit. It does not include other costs you also bear: the on-exchange bid-ask spread, your broker's fees, the fund's internal transaction costs in some cases, or taxes. Two ETFs with the same TER can deliver different results — the definitive metric is the tracking difference: how much the fund actually deviates from its index each year, which is the true total cost.
It is deducted daily from the fund's net asset value, pro rata. The price you see already has it discounted — which is why it is invisible and why you should look for it actively.
It is the first filter, not the last: fund size, domicile, distribution policy and tracking difference complete the decision. Between two identical replicas of the same index, the combination of TER + replication quality wins.
Because they include retrocessions: part of the fee flows back to the distributor. Clean share classes and ETFs remove that overhead — you saw the 30-year difference above.